Love this. I think this is a great opener for an alternative set of perspectives which revolves around plurality (rather than complexity, which might seem on the surface like the logical opposite of simplicity).

The reasons why I think this is healthier and less divergent (counter-intuitively) is that we accept and embrace that what we might sometimes perceive (rightly or wrongly, true or not) as differences, incongruence and detailed nuances are not mutually exclusive and isn't there to "simplify away" as goal in and of itself.